Donald John’s Despotic Mindmeld

Television coverage of Trump’s rallies in recent days repeatedly brought to mind what a creepy, disdainful character he is, but it was followed by bewilderment: What on earth attracts persons who appear to be angry, childish adults to Trump’s stream of incoherence? Can they not see that he offers no solutions to whatever concerns them, nothing but inanities and whatever gets the louder cheers?

Most persons with an authentic interest in governance improvement are reluctant to express their prescriptions incased in simplistic shouting. Trump’s crowds, on the other hand, seem untroubled by the bizarre verbal torrent that issues without end from their mendacious authoritarian. It is as if they really don’t care that he can never be counted on for either truth or decency.

However, we can make an educated guess that Trumpers’ fascination for conspiracy theories is a good match for Trump’s own. Neither you nor I can know at a distance whether that is true, but we all too frequently are treated to Trump’s setting about his proud portrayal as Mr. Conspiracy Theorist, jumping from one unsubstantiated story to another, intentionally bestowing validation by virtue of the office we foolishly gave him. He seems naturally to exude an enticement for personality characteristics that match his own (or better, that match what they wish were their own), a powerful attraction not to sincerity, authenticity, modesty, or accuracy, but to bloviation, vanity, blaming, irresponsibility, and self-aggrandizement.

In other words, Trumpers may like Trump because they are like him or want to be. But there are better sources about this matter beyond my retired psychologist top-of-the-head reflections. You can find far greater understanding from writers (referenced below) whose command of autocracies, democracies-becoming-autocracies, and authoritarians who seize autocratic power while you and I slumber with pleasant dreams of “it can’t happen here.”

“It is proper to take alarm at the first experiment on our liberties.”  —James Madison, fourth U.S. president (1751-1836), “A Memorial and Remonstrance,” 1785


Unlike my recent posts on this topic, I will simply extract a number of points (not presented with the exactness of quotations unless so marked) from three authors relevant to this post, to wit:

Beware the one party state . . . “human nature is such that American democracy must be defended from Americans who would exploit its freedoms to bring about its end.” [OT, p.27]

A would-be autocrat is more likely to become an autocrat depending in part on how firmly the established politicians oppose it. [HDD, p.8]

Citizens who are resentful or unsuccessful are more likely to feel attracted to authoritarianism than those who are not. [TOD, p.24]

Be wary of paramilitaries. “When men with guns who have always claimed to be against the system start wearing uniforms and marching with torches and pictures of a leader, the end is nigh.” [OT, p.42]

America raised the likelihood of autocracy when in November 2016, it elected a president with a dubious allegiance to democratic norms.  Trump’s surprise victory was made possible not only by public disaffection but also by the Republican Party’s failure to keep an extremist demagogue within its own ranks from gaining the nomination. [HDD, p.8]

He/she rejects the constitution or expresses a willingness to violate it, or suggests a need for antidemocratic behaviors such as cancelling elections.

A politician is more likely to adopt authoritarian behaviors if:  [HDD pp. 23-27]

  • He/she describes their rivals as subversive, opposed to the existing constitutional order; baselessly describes their partisan rivals as criminals whose supposed violation of the law disqualifies them from full participation in politics.
  • He/she has any ties to armed gangs, paramilitary forces, militias, guerillas or other illicit violence; tacitly endorse violence by their supporters by refusing to unambiguously condemn it and punish it; supported laws or policies that restrict civil liberties, such as expanded libel or defamation laws, or laws restricting protests.
  • He/she praised repressive measures taken by other governments in the past or elsewhere in the world; if extremist parties emerge as contenders.


Abbreviations used above refer to these books:

“HDD:” How Democracies Die, by Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt.

“TD:” Twilight of Democracy: The Seductive Lure of Authoritarianism, by Anne Applebaum.

“OT:” On Tyranny: Twenty Lessons from the Twentieth Century, by Timothy Snyder.

(Additional books not referred to in this post may be found in recent posts concerned with autocracy.)


[JohnJustThinking is an irregular commentary by me (unless otherwise noted) on social, ethical, scientific, and non-partisan political, partisan political, and cultural interests. More than 230 essays have been posted since mid-2013, all accessible from any page. If you choose to be a Follower (there is no charge), you’ll be automatically notified with each new post.]









About John Bruce Carver

I am a U. S. citizen living in Atlanta, Georgia, having grown up in Chattanooga, Tennessee, and graduating from Chattanooga High School. I served in the Electronic Security Command of the U. S. Air Force before receiving a B.S. degree in business/economics and an M.Ed. in educational psychology, both at the University of Tennessee at Chattanooga. I then completed a Ph.D. in clinical (and research) psychology at Emory University. I have two daughters and three granddaughters. An ardent international traveller, I have been in over 70 countries for business and pleasure. My reading, other than novels, tends to be in history, philosophy, government, and light science. I identify philosophically as a secular humanist, in complete awe of the universe including my fellows and myself. I am married to my best friend, Miriam, formerly of the United Kingdom and Canada.
This entry was posted in Politics. Bookmark the permalink.

7 Responses to Donald John’s Despotic Mindmeld

  1. Daniel D. Hull says:

    Since you rarely ever mention any reason why we should vote for the alternative presidential candidate other than he’s not that vile Donald Trump, I get the feeling you wouldn’t have much cared who won the Democrat nomination for president, counting on hate for 45 to be enough for a Democrat win regardless of any shortcomings of the other candidate. I doubt voters will buy the “honesty and decency” comparison, given the recent revelations of the former vice president’s and son’s crooked dealings with China, Ukraine and Russia (yes, Russia!) to enrich the Biden family and give the drug-addicted son something to do with all his spare time.

    • “Hate?” Pointing out the unethical, lie-filled, bullying, and reckless disregard for avoidable Covid19 death that America has suffered due to 2016’s Big Blunder is not expression of hate but distress. The president’s behavior and remarks that have disgraced America both domestically and abroad have come repeatedly from Trump himself. Surely even his own Trump TV can’t ignore four years of this shameful, dishonorable president. He and his buddies-in-sleaze make it hard for remnants of the Republican Party not to grasp at straws (like the snide use of “drug-addicted son” and “crooked dealings” with Ukraine)—while Trump proceeds unhindered to sacrifice America’s democratic republic to assure a Trumpian Totalitarianism. While Republicans make uninformed noise about “socialism,” to cover his tracks, I think I’ll hold out for honesty, competence, empathy, science-mindfulness, White House experience, Constitution-consciousness, and, oh yes, as you said, “not that vile Donald Trump.”

    • Daniel D. Hull says:

      Honesty? You seriously believe Biden is honest? Maybe you should have waited to post that assumption until we know all of the facts about his and his son’s dealings with China and Russia.

    • Vapid point, Dan, but I suppose you’ve no choice when defending a nonstop liar. Let’s consider (a) Joe Biden is running for president; Hunter is not. (b) We’ll never “know all the facts” about dealings with China and Russia. (c) I’d have been happy to assume both Trump and Biden are honest until shown to be otherwise—that’s what fair-minded persons do. (d) Trump misinforms and lies on a virtually permanent basis, actually rendering it stupid to believe him. Almost anyone, including Republicans, would expect to be laughed at for claiming Trump to be as honest as, let’s say, you are. (e) I have listened to Biden and read testimony by and about him. He might disappoint me someday, but it hasn’t happened yet. (f) I have listened to Trump and read testimony by and about him, as he gushes lies on trivial topics and momentous ones, not occasionally but habitually enough to be a lifestyle. Yes, Dan, I seriously believe Joe Biden is honest.

      [I eliminated Hunter Biden from this impromptu comparison when I began. I have reason to judge Joe, but not Hunter. Even if no more than a matter of interest, I’d consider myself unethical to assess Hunter given my vague knowledge of his behavior. I notice that not everyone avoids unfair critique, especially if there are political points to be made.]

    • Daniel D. Hull says:

      Okay, forget Hunter. Let’s just see if any of these corruption allegations against Joe amount to anything. Maybe they won’t, just like the three year Mueller investigation did not find Trump guilty of colluding with the Russians to help him win the presidency in 2016.

  2. says:

    Perhaps with luck there will be a huge number of Trump supporters unable to vote because they all have Covid!!

    • Daniel D. Hull Lt Col, USAF(Ret) says:

      So you don’t wish us dead, just sick with a deadly virus that could kill us. Nice.

Comments are moderated, so there will be a delay before they appear.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s